Summary:
In this excerpt from “The Mind and Its Place in Nature,” C.D. Broad sets out to systematically analyze the possible relationships between mind and matter. He begins by outlining a classification system that results in seventeen distinct theoretical possibilities. These are based on combinations of attributes (mentality and materiality) that can be:
- Differentiating: Unique to a substance
- Emergent: Arising from combinations of other attributes
- Reducible: Explainable in terms of other attributes
- Delusive: Seemingly present but not actually real
Broad then proceeds to evaluate each of these seventeen possibilities, eliminating those he deems impossible or absurd. He refutes theories like pure materialism and behaviorism, arguing that they fail to account for the subjective experience of consciousness. He also critiques mentalism, which posits that materiality is an illusion.
Broad ultimately favors a form of emergent materialism, where mentality arises from complex material structures, although he acknowledges the possibility of neutral monism (where both mind and matter emerge from a neutral substance). He concludes by exploring the implications of these theories for the future of mind in the universe, emphasizing the importance of scientific progress in psychology and the potential dangers of unequal development across different branches of knowledge.
Evaluation:
Broad’s analysis is notable for its systematic and rigorous approach. He meticulously defines his terms and constructs a comprehensive framework for understanding the mind-matter problem. His arguments are clear, logical, and often insightful, particularly his critiques of behaviorism and reductive materialism.
However, the excerpt also reveals some limitations:
- Dependence on Definitions: Broad’s conclusions heavily rely on his specific definitions of terms like “mentality” and “materiality.” Different interpretations of these concepts could lead to different conclusions.
- Limited Empirical Evidence: Broad acknowledges the limitations of empirical evidence in supporting his preferred theory. The lack of strong evidence for or against many of the theories he discusses makes his conclusions somewhat tentative.
- Overly Simplistic Categories: While Broad’s classification system is helpful, it may be overly simplistic. The complex relationship between mind and matter might not fit neatly into his predefined categories.
- Potential for Bias: Broad’s preference for emergent materialism may be influenced by the scientific worldview prevalent in his time.
Despite these limitations, Broad’s work remains a valuable contribution to the philosophy of mind. His systematic approach and insightful arguments provide a framework for continued exploration of the mind-matter problem. His emphasis on the importance of scientific progress in psychology and the potential dangers of unequal development across different branches of knowledge remains relevant today.
———————————————-
Put in chart form the seventeen types of mind/body relations in cd broad’s mind and its place in nature
C.D. Broad, in his influential work “The Mind and Its Place in Nature,” meticulously outlines 17 possible relationships between mind and body. Here’s a chart summarizing these views, categorized by how they treat the mental and the physical:
| Mind/Body Relation | Mental | Physical | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Pure Idealism | Real & Fundamental | Delusive or Non-Existent | Only minds and their contents are real. The physical world is an illusion or a mental construct. |
| 2. Epiphenomenalism | Emergent | Real & Fundamental | The physical world is primary. Minds emerge from physical processes but have no causal influence on them. |
| 3. Emergent Materialism | Emergent | Real & Fundamental | Similar to epiphenomenalism, but minds, though emergent from the physical, can causally affect the physical. |
| 4. Psychical Causation | Real & Fundamental | Emergent | Minds are fundamental. The physical world emerges from mental processes or is causally influenced by them. |
| 5. Mentalistic Monism | Real & Fundamental | Reducible to Mental | Both mind and matter are real, but the physical world is ultimately reducible to minds or mental events. |
| 6. Neutral Monism | Reducible to a Neutral Substance | Reducible to a Neutral Substance | Both mind and matter are aspects or manifestations of a more fundamental, neutral substance. |
| 7. Materialistic Monism | Reducible to Physical | Real & Fundamental | Both mind and matter are real, but the mental is ultimately reducible to physical processes. |
| 8. Pre-Established Harmony | Real & Distinct | Real & Distinct | Mind and matter are distinct substances that do not causally interact but are perfectly coordinated by a pre-existing harmony. |
| 9. Occasionalism | Real & Distinct | Real & Distinct | Similar to pre-established harmony, but the coordination between mind and body is achieved through God’s constant intervention. |
| 10. Interactionism | Real & Distinct | Real & Distinct | Mind and matter are distinct substances that causally interact with each other. |
| 11. Parallelism | Real & Distinct | Real & Distinct | Mind and matter are distinct substances that exist in parallel without any causal interaction. |
| 12. Double Aspect Theory | Aspect of a Single Substance | Aspect of a Single Substance | Mind and matter are two different aspects or perspectives of a single underlying substance. |
| 13. Compound Theory | Combination of Mental and Physical Elements | Real & Distinct | The mind is composed of both mental and physical elements, while the physical world exists independently. |
| 14. Emergent Neutralism | Emergent from a Neutral Substance | Emergent from a Neutral Substance | Both mind and matter emerge from a more fundamental, neutral substance. |
| 15. Identity Theory | Identical to Physical | Identical to Mental | Mental states and physical states are identical, meaning they are one and the same thing. |
| 16. Eliminative Materialism | Delusive or Non-Existent | Real & Fundamental | Mental states, as commonly understood, do not exist. Only physical processes are real. |
| 17. Panpsychism | Fundamental Property | Real, with Mental Properties | Mind is a fundamental property of all matter, not just living things. |
Export to Sheets
This table provides a concise overview of Broad’s 17 classifications. It’s important to note that Broad himself didn’t advocate for any single view but rather aimed to provide a comprehensive and neutral framework for understanding the diverse possibilities in the mind-body debate.