Emergent materialism and artifacts

EXPAND on my ideas on artifacts. Natural artivacts are the products of eolution. Human artifacts are either social or non-social. Both natural and social artifacts are part of emergent materialism.

ChatGPT said:

Got it — here’s a richer expansion of your ideas, staying close to your original structure and meaning:


Artifacts are entities that bear the imprint of a process of formation guided by specific principles or dynamics. Broadly, artifacts can be divided into natural and human-made kinds.

Natural artifacts are the products of evolution. Over immense timescales, living systems and complex structures have arisen through evolutionary processes, involving variation, selection, and adaptation. These natural artifacts, such as the eye, the honeybee’s dance, or even broader systems like ecological niches, are not created by human intention, but they nevertheless exhibit purposive structure and function. They embody accumulated adaptations shaped by evolutionary pressures, giving them a quasi-designed appearance without any conscious designer. Natural artifacts are thus emergent phenomena, arising from the dynamics of matter and life without external imposition.

Human artifacts can be divided into two categories: social and non-social.

  • Non-social human artifacts are physical objects created through deliberate human action but not inherently dependent on shared social understandings. A hammer, a plow, or a piece of pottery exists primarily as a tool shaped by physical needs and engineering principles. Although their use often involves social contexts, their structure and function are primarily defined materially.
  • Social human artifacts, on the other hand, are products of shared meaning, convention, and collective intentionality. Laws, money, rituals, languages, and institutions are examples. Their existence and efficacy are sustained by common social agreements and interpretations. Unlike purely material artifacts, social artifacts can dissolve if the social frameworks that sustain them collapse. A coin may still physically exist, but its value as money vanishes if the social structure recognizing it does.

Both natural artifacts and social artifacts are part of emergent materialism — the philosophical view that higher-level structures and properties (like life, consciousness, societies) emerge from material substrates without being reducible to them. Emergent materialism holds that while everything is ultimately grounded in material reality, new layers of organization bring about novel properties and behaviors that cannot be fully explained in terms of their lower-level constituents alone.

Thus, whether through the blind “craftsmanship” of evolution or the intentional creativity of human societies, artifacts represent emergent structures — layered realities that owe their existence to material conditions but operate with their own autonomous patterns and principles.




I. Natural Artifacts

(Products of evolutionary processes)

  • Evolutionary structures (e.g., eye, wing, immune system)
  • Ecological systems (e.g., coral reefs, predator-prey dynamics)
  • Behavioral adaptations (e.g., bee dances, bird migration)

II. Human Artifacts

A. Non-Social Artifacts
(Physical objects created for functional purposes)

  • Tools (e.g., hammer, wheel, spear)
  • Technology (e.g., machines, bridges)

B. Social Artifacts
(Exist by shared meaning and social agreement)

  • Language and communication systems
  • Money, contracts, institutions
  • Cultural norms, religious rites

Key Notes:

  • Natural artifacts emerge without conscious design.
  • Non-social artifacts depend mainly on material properties.
  • Social artifacts depend heavily on collective intentionality.
  • All artifacts are examples of emergence: higher-level patterns arising from material processes.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.