{"id":1884,"date":"2019-06-09T14:59:22","date_gmt":"2019-06-09T14:59:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/?p=1884"},"modified":"2019-06-09T14:59:23","modified_gmt":"2019-06-09T14:59:23","slug":"response-to-some-objections-to-my-claims-and-proposals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/2019\/06\/09\/response-to-some-objections-to-my-claims-and-proposals\/","title":{"rendered":"Response to some objections to my claims and proposals"},"content":{"rendered":"\nObjection 1:  Your proposal to give each person a right to free subsistence land is a retrogressive proposal.\n<p>\nResponse to 1: My insistence on giving each person the right to free subsistence land is threefold: (1) to provide the theoretical contradictory of capitalism, since the very definition of capitalism requires the existence of a proletariat; (2) to provide for those who do not wish to participate in a social undertaking &#8212; e.g., those who wish to be hermits; (3) throughout the world there are indigenous people who already live by agriculture or herding &#8212; their right to do so has to be secured.\n<p>\nIt is, of course, more efficient to live in a cooperative manner. But this should be a matter of choice &#8212; a choice which reasonable people will make.  As Kropotkin pointed out, a single tractor can do the work of 100 men.  I am for using all the technology available. I am not for retrogression.  Organizing an agrarian village seems simple by comparison to organizing a large city.  In Ukraine [1918-21], the anarchist Nestor Makhno had no problem with villages, but cities baffled him.  But, on the other hand, some crisis &#8212; like the loss of the electric grid &#8212; may force people to a more primitive way of living.\n<hr>\n<p>\nObjection 2: Overpopulation is not a problem. Malthus and the Ehrichs were wrong.\n<p>\nResponse 2:  They cannot be faulted for the general claim (1) that no living species can continue to expand beyond the resources of food. The other claim is: (2) food resources are limited. And the conclusion, then, is: (3) the population will stop expanding.\n<p>\n I don&#8217;t know of any way to dispute (1). However, (2) could be disputed by claiming that technology could make an unlimited amount of food. Presently, I do not see this in the offing. As to (3), there is a choice &#8212; either limit population growth through some kind of human intervention, or natural disasters will dwindle the populations in their own ways.\n<hr>\n<p>\nObjection 3: Switzerland should not be held up as a model for anarchists.\n<p>\nResponse 3: I do not use Switzerland as a model for anarchism. I simply claim that it is the most democratic State in the world.  The best feature is the seven-member Federal Council as contrasted with one-man rule of a President or a Prime Minister.  It is also superior to the election of a President through Macro Democracy.  And like the United States, it is a federal system with three layers of government: national, cantonal, and municipal &#8212;  unlike the unitary or &#8220;integral&#8221; government as in Ukraine.  Switzerland also has national and cantonal initiatives and referendums, which act as public controls on the government.  \n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Objection 1: Your proposal to give each person a right to free subsistence land is a retrogressive proposal. Response to 1: My insistence on giving each person the right to free subsistence land is threefold: (1) to provide the theoretical contradictory of capitalism, since the very definition of capitalism requires the existence of a proletariat; &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/2019\/06\/09\/response-to-some-objections-to-my-claims-and-proposals\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Response to some objections to my claims and proposals&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1884","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bullshit-beliefs"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1884","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1884"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1884\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1885,"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1884\/revisions\/1885"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1884"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1884"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1884"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}