{"id":1869,"date":"2019-06-05T12:57:24","date_gmt":"2019-06-05T12:57:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/?p=1869"},"modified":"2020-09-22T16:14:23","modified_gmt":"2020-09-22T16:14:23","slug":"is-an-employer-a-capitalist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/2019\/06\/05\/is-an-employer-a-capitalist\/","title":{"rendered":"Is an employer a capitalist?"},"content":{"rendered":"\nWe &#8212; including me &#8212; often use the word &#8220;capitalist&#8221; as a synonym for &#8220;employer,&#8221;  &#8220;entrepreneur,&#8221; or &#8220;businessman.&#8221; But on reflection, this is a mistake; or, at best, a problem of ambiguity. Capitalism is a kind of theory, and a &#8220;capitalist&#8221; should be the name of a person who subscribes to this theory. \n<p>\nTo illustrate the linguistic problem here, consider the case of <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Friedrich_Engels\">Friedrich Engels<\/a>, Karl Marx&#8217;s doppelganger.  Both were arch anti-capitalists. But Engels was the son of an owner of textile factories in Salford, England and in Barmen, Prussia. He was, thus, an employer. And if one uses the word &#8220;capitalist&#8221; as a synonym for &#8220;employer,&#8221; than we get the paradoxical result that the arch anti-capitalist was a capitalist!\n<p>\nThis apparent paradox is due to the ambiguous use of the term &#8220;capitalist.&#8221; If we were writing a dictionary, we would have to introduce two meanings for the word: Capitalist-1, an employer; Capitalist-2, someone who subscribes to the politico-economic theory of capitalism.\n<p>\nWith that distinction, we could then get rid of the paradox by saying that Engels, the capitalist-1, was an anti-capitalist-2.\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>We &#8212; including me &#8212; often use the word &#8220;capitalist&#8221; as a synonym for &#8220;employer,&#8221; &#8220;entrepreneur,&#8221; or &#8220;businessman.&#8221; But on reflection, this is a mistake; or, at best, a problem of ambiguity. Capitalism is a kind of theory, and a &#8220;capitalist&#8221; should be the name of a person who subscribes to this theory. To illustrate &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/2019\/06\/05\/is-an-employer-a-capitalist\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Is an employer a capitalist?&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[49,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-capitalism","category-linguistic-bullshit"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1869"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1869\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1871,"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1869\/revisions\/1871"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ditext.com\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}